I don't disagree with your assessment of Rogan or Musk--indeed, great job! However, I feel you gloss over the problem that science can only test hypothesis, it can't make a judgement call about whether or not a certain effect is good or bad for anyone.

RFJ Jr. questions whether the side effects of the mRNA vaccines were worth whatever effect the vaccines had on people. Although I feel he is mostly looking for votes and attention, like Andrew Bridgen in the UK, how else are we to get scientists to study those questions? Rather, how are we going to get our government to research something that may make them look bad? (even though every intelligent person understands hindsight is 20/20?).

It's just my opinion, but I feel the mRNA vaccines were not very effective against the strains of Covid they ended up attacking. I believe the lockdowns and masks will end up doing more harm than good. I believe there are serious side effects to the mRNA vaccines which NO ONE is paid to find and NO ONE wants to know if true (including myself). So how do we get there? Again, not for me. I took all the shots. But for young people? Or other types of mRNA vaccines in the future?

These questions need science to provide evidence but they aren't questions that scientists must, or want, to answer. To argue that someone needs to be a true scientist to ask a question I believe only bolsters current political authority. As annoyed as I am with Rogan and Musk, they have the fame to get these questions answered. Again, probably for ALL the wrong reasons.

Still, I want to know and there is no other way to get there that I can see.