Thanks for reply.

"Some" doesn't do it for me. I understand you're not saying it works for you either. Generally, more educated (healthier living) people take vaccines. How much is that cohort showing less deaths naturally part of the lower number of deaths, and how much attributed to the vaccine? I know you understand all this. So the answer to my question, I believe, is we still don't have conclusive evidence about what the vaccine did to who, in what condition, at what time, under what controls.

Every time I read a research paper I can't get more than a few paragraphs in where the researchers haven't pointed out the exceptions (problem with not having enough or the right data) that they will be able to make a strong conclusion. So no need for you to look. But if you come across a good one in the future, let me know.

I'm somewhat a student of the history of statistics (or was, have forgotten most of it). From the very first day statistics became at thing politicians worked to hide anything negative that might come out of them. 200 years later. I see no change. if anything, it's WORSE. Theoretically, it should be better. It would have been child's play to record everyone's vaccine experience, etc. Instead, I got a vaccine card that was more poorly printed then what I would have received during the Spanish Flu outbreak!

The biggest reason I don't believe the vaccines worked is most people get very angry at me for voicing the opinion that they don't. That tells me the politicians have succeeded at hiding the negatives all too well ;)

Thanks again for reply. Barry was interested too!