That is certainly better! Thanks! However, my problem wasn't that it made an absolute statement but that it is not a scientifically intelligence answer.

Yes, there is no evidence to suggest that mRNA vaccines cause cancer in children. Then why say, that the "mRNA vaccines are being researched as a potential treatment for cancer"? Please think hard on that Lannie!

It says it has no evidence that it causes cancer but implies there is more evidence that it is a treatment! Whoa! Okay, fine, suggest that the research might be a "potential treatment" for cancer, but there is "no evidence" to indicate we'll find that it causes it. Why doesn't that jump out at you? I think I know why it has answered in that way, but I'll leave that rabbit hole for another time.

Then it says mRNA used in vaccines does not alter DNA and therefore cannot cause cancer. I HAD KNOW IDEA that cancer is caused by MODIFIED DNA! Or, even if it is, isn't EVERYTHING? DNA has nothing to do with the question.

mRNA vaccines trigger RNA to create antibodies. When did I ask it about DNA? What we don't know, is what else the vaccines may trigger in the DNA/RNA system. It's creating a strawhorse argument here. Again, it is saying something absolute 'therefore cannot cause cancer". It's a tautological argument, not scientific. That is,

Altered DNA causes cancer

mRNA vaccines do not alter DNA

Therefore Altered DNA does not cause cancer.

A person would get kicked out of Grad School for arguing such a thing.

GTP-4 Chattie is designed to make money giving the user a false sense of knowledge. It is adept at all the flaws of Rhetoric Aristotle pointed out. It is a scourge of society, just like the Sophists of Greek times.

Mini rant over ;) Thanks Lannie!