Yes, it is factually incorrect to say mRNA vaccines don't cause cancer. It would be factually incorrect to say bottled water doesn't cause cancer. The best we can say is that in the past 2 years there aren't been any studies that show that the mRNA vaccines cause cancer. Or we can say, that earlier experiments on small groups did not show cancer.

Why is it that when anyone said Covid came from a lab, or the vaccines were dangerous, were labeled Trump supporters (I hate him btw)? Why is it that we can't say those things but a computer can say it knows as a fact that mRNA vaccines don't cause cancer?

Intelligence would be understanding that science does not prove the positive of anything. It cannot prove that something does NOT cause something else. It can only show evidence that that there isn't a correlation between data and the null hypothesis--that is, a difference in cancer between populations who received the mRNA vaccine and those that didn't.

The reason they didn't catch the problem of Thalidomide earlier is it takes time to see the problems.

This AI is just Trump computerized. It tells people want they want to hear. Blows my mind.

In twenty years I'll be comfortable saying mRNA doesn't cause cancer.